During the first six months of 2015 the Swedish Migration Bureau discovered 41 war criminals and terrorists attempting to seek asylum in Sweden but there are probably many more, because Sweden is one of the only countries in Europe that doesn’t require that immigrants identify themselves when seeking asylum.

So far this year 41 asylum seekers suspected of war- or terror crimes have been discovered by the Migration Bureau, compared to 20 during last year, according to Ekot.

”It’s an important question for society at large to intercept these cases but it’s also an important question so that the asylum system shall remain reliable and work as intended”, says Magnus Bengtsson, who helps personell identify individuals who attempt to hide their real identities.

But the cases aren’t easy to discover, according to Magnus Bengtsson.

”You have to remember that these people often come with stories, not much documentation, sometimes none at all”, – he says to Ekot

The reason being that Sweden is unique for not requiring immigrants to show valid identification. Subsequently only 1/10 choose to identify themselves during the asylum process. Therefore it is easy for an IS-terrorist to be granted permanent residence and a new identity in Sweden under a false name.

In the few cases when the Migration Bureau, together with the Swedish Security Service, can confirm that a terrorist or war criminal has sought asylum, the person does not get deported, instead he gets a temporary Visa.

According to Ekot this is because terrorists from war-torn countries in the Middle East cannot be deported from Sweden.

Picture: The fall of the Berlin Wall on the 9th of November 1989. For 28 years it had divided Germany in two. The East German government called it the “Anti-Fascist Rampart“

The political landscape in Sweden is changing from the ground up. It isn’t happening over a few hours time, like when the Berlin Wall fell on the 9th of November in 1989. But it’s happening. And what we are seeing now is only the beginning. How will the corrupt media adapt to the change? The question is if and when they will realize that the battle is lost and that an epoch of lies, whitewashing and agenda journalism has come to an end.

The change will be painful for journalists

Whether journalists like it or not the political shift in conjunction with the swift & subsequent decay of important areas of society (schools, elderly care, healthcare, criminality, unemployment, housing shortage) will gradually force journalism to mirror reality instead of the opinions of individual journalists or the political agenda of editors. It simply isn’t possible to lie about the blessings of multiculturalism or mass immigration forever when citizens clearly see with their own eyes how their country is being dismantled in front of them. The change will be painful for journalists. The media’s final stand is proportional to the losses journalists make when their lies are unveiled. It won’t be pretty.

Sweden Democrats break new record – 18,7% in Demoskop

In the latest Demoskop/Expressen poll, support for the Moderates had reduced by 3% to 23,1%. The Sweden Democrats increased by the same amount and broke a new record with 18,7%. Only 4,4% now separates the Sweden Democrats from the Moderates. All of the remaining parties have either increased or decreased within the margin of error

”It’s a dramatic development of the public opinion. SD’s continued rise has without comparison been the biggest element of change in Swedish politics. In just a month the party has halved the gap between the two parties.” – says Peter Santesson, Head of Public Opinion Analysis at Demoskop.

Not even K-G Bergström dares be certain

”This survey will probably send shockwaves through our biggest political parties.” writes Karl-Gösta Bergström, who up until now has never missed an opportunity to write something negative about the Sweden Democrats. Now he doesn’t dare be certain about anything.

Demoskop’s survey was mostly done during the Almedalen Week (week 27). K-G Bergström writes in Expressen:

”Neither Stefan Löfven nor Anna Kinberg Batra seem to have accomplished anything there which has made voters who went over to SD regret their decision.”

”In the eyes of many, Jimmie Åkesson was arrogant in Visby when he unhesitatingly proclaimed that the Sweden Democrats will become Sweden biggest party. To that end seven percentage remain. It’s a lot, but legitimately less than ever than ever.”

”The safety margin to SD is insecure to say the least”

”Even now the safe bet is that SD won’t catch up to S, but I can no longer be certain when saying that. The distance to M is only 4,4 percentage points. Seeing as Kinberg Batra hasn’t been a success, so far in any case, and it is there where the biggest discontent towards the December Agreement exists, it seems that the safety-margin to SD is, to say the very least, unsafe.”

I note that K-G Bergström describes the safety margin between the two parties as ”unsafe”. SD’s successes thereby threaten the Moderates illusion of safety that rests on the December Agreement. The Moderates treating the Sweden Democrats as pariah is coming under heavy fire from their own voters.

Corrected SD result in Demoskop: 21,8%

When it comes to measuring the support SD has amongst the public Demoskop is one of the least accurate opinion institutes. In the 2014 election Demoskop predicted that SD would get 11,2%. The election result was 12,7%. The Norwegian opinion institute Sentio were the only one to make the correct prediction.

If you correct Demoskop’s current SD poll using previous deviations they now have 21,8%. That corresponds better with the party’s June result from Sentio (22,1%), YouGov (20,1%) and Novus (18%). Demoskop showed 15,7% for SD in June.

”The government is paralyzed by haphephobia”

(Haphephobia (n) = fear of touching or being touched)

”With regards to the refugee question the red-green government is paralyzed by haphephobia. Prime Minister Stefan Löfven has simply abdicated from responsibility. The Social-Democratic party congress this year symptomatically decided to not even bring up the migration question. The Green Party lives in a parallel universe where economic resources are infinite” – writes Jenny Sonesson in a leader for Dagens Industri.

The Alliance parties have tied their hands behind their back with the December Agreement and now pretend to be in opposition with unparalleled acting. The opinion polls show that voters are calling their bluff.

Public opinion is no longer possible to ignore

Prior to the 2010 election the goal for large parts of the journalist corps was to use any means necessary to prevent SD from entering the Riksdag.

Two years later, in 2012, and the methods hadn’t improved much. In one particularly distasteful case Jimmie Åkesson, party leader of the Sweden Democrats, was depicted as a cockroach in need of gassing.

But the latest opinion poll should get the journalists who for years have systematically covered up facts and have acted as propagandists for multiculturalism, mass immigration and radical feminism to tremble in their boots. Many years of desperate attempts from journalists and others to stop SD have failed. It is simply not possible to ignore 1/5th of the electorate.

”We know it’s true, but we don’t publicize it”

How will the media handle it? It’s going to be a painful process. Björn Hägers book ”The problematic party” (written prior to the 2010 election) reveals the strained relationship between journalists and SD. In the chronicle ”The Journalist Party and Democracy” I quoted some journalists who were interviewed in the book.

Pontus Mattsson, then political reporter at Sweden Radio’s Eko editorial office, now at Sweden’s Television:

”I think that many would think it a relief if they had a bad election result and ended up under 2 percent, then we wouldn’t have to deal with them.”

Jan A Johansson, chief editor at Skånska Dagbladet

”They (SD) have a number of claims regarding immigration groups, criminality, in Malmö especially, where they go out with claims that we know we are true. We can control them, we know about them, but we don’t publish them anyway because we know that it causes social development a shitload of harm.”

Börn Häger:

”Journalists are biased in favour of the current norms and values – and a party that deviates will therefore get the media against them.”

”SD is the obvious alternative for conservatives”

”As early as 2001 the first article on how to stop the Sweden Democrats was published and printed in DN Debatt. 15 years later and the list of more or less worthy attempts to halt the party’s growth is long. ”Don’t talk to them!” ”Talk about them but not with them!” ”Insult them!” The list of successful countermeasures is nonetheless empty. Nothing seems to have helped.” writes the political scientist Andreas Johansson Heinö in Borås Tidning.

”SD have rewritten the political map in Sweden on their own. As a result of this the traditional bourgeois debate regarding liberalism vs. conservatives is becoming obsolete. SD is already the obvious conservative option in Swedish politics.”

Aftonbladet and public service are the last bastions

After the incestuous debauchery at the Almedalen Week between political rulers and the those (journalists) who are appointed to scrutinize them, a couple of weeks of vacation remain. But in August reality will rear it’s ugly head at the editorial offices.

It will be a tough struggle for Aftonbladet and Public Service in particular, the most prominent fortresses of entrenched medial liars. A veritable Berlin Wall of one-eyed left-wing fanaticism. Writers like Aftonbladets Anders Lindberg, Karin Pettersson, Lena Mellin, Daniel Swedin, Jan Guillou, Somar Al Naher, Åsa Linderborg, Fredrik Virtanen, and Oisin Cantwell are beyond saving. The more one has invested in an ideologically controlled and inaccurate worldview, the greater the fall once it all comes crashing down.

More than 80% of state media employees vote Red-Green

Journalists residing in the left-wing fortresses have crafted a unique world view which has little to do with reality. In the world outside of the editorial offices it could be seen as verging on deranged. Which is why most people don’t recognize the world as described by Aftonbladet or Dagens Arena. Or SR:s (Sweden’s Radio) and SVT:s (Sweden’s Television) propaganda which is broadcast across the country from morning to evening.

Professor Kent Asp has in his investigations shown that at Sweden’s Television and Sweden’s Radio a majority sympathize with the Green Party. 52% and 54% respectively and over 80% of journalists working with the Public Service Media sympathize with the Red-Green parties (Left Party, Social-Democrats, and Green Party).

In the election said coalition received a mere 43% of the votes which says a lot about the ideological gap between the journalists working for the public service media and the Swedish people.

”Neutrality is regarded as complicity”

Jasenko Selimovic, formerly the Minister of Integration’s Secretary of State (Peoples Party and previous head of a section at Sweden’s Radio, writes in the periodical Axess about how journalism is gradually changing. He takes the left-wing propagandists working at Aftonbladet and Dagens Arena as an example of political activism as opposed to journalism:

”Previously journalism (and art) was about mirroring, showing voters reality from different perspectives, to make them understand people who don’t think like them, creating an open debate. Nowadays journalists act like escorts, helpers and advocates and less like journalists (…) The idea is anchored in conviction that citizens are weak, entrapped in overbearing structures, unable to oppose the power of the elite and media. That’s why they [the people] need help, interpreters, escorts, rather than journalists.”

“The Left at Arena- and Aftonbladet’s culture pages mock the unwillingness to take a stand. Neutrality is regarded as complicity. Because if citizens are weak and the danger of racism is real, everyone must, including journalists, act, they seem to mean. That’s how citizens and democracy is defended. Activism instead of journalism, taking a stance instead of being neutral, impact awareness instead of impact neutrality.”

Menstruation, transsexuality, unrestricted Immigration and masturbation

“Summer on P1” is one of the most popular shows on Swedish Radio. It is broadcast every day. I switch on my radio at random. On the 30th of June the blogger Clara Henry, 21, talks. ”In autumn her book on menstruation is being released”. Wow! It’s time for a menstrual festival with tampon throwing and drinks with blood clots. I turn it off.

On the 3rd of July transsexual Saga Becker, 26, explains how hard it is to come out of the closet and live like a tranny. I couldn’t care less. I turn it off. On the 4th of July the author and multi-millionaire Liza Marklund, 52, pleads for open borders and unrestricted immigration”.

”For example I think people should be able to live wherever they like in principle. Get rid of all the borders. If Sweden was as densely populated as South Korea 180 million people would live here. And that works well for South Korea, so why not?” – she asks.

I’m pretty sure it’s only on Swedish state radio where people can blurt out such idiocy. I turn it off.

On the 6th of July I turn on the radio at around 14.00. The cartoonist Nina Hemmingsson, 43, discusses masturbation and her orgasms. I turn it off.

Summer – a platform for vagina introspection and multiculturalism

I long for the time when ”Summer” was a program you could listen to. Prior to 1997 when Bibi Rödöö turned it into a platform for vagina introspection and orgasm exhibitionism.

I am dead tired of narcissistic artists, conversations lacking substance and the most perverted hate imaginable being spewed by flipped out screw ups on the extreme-left (Athena Farrkohzad, 21, July 2014) But this is State Radio in its prime. Listeners are to be spoon fed immigration and radical feminism till they puke or choke.

I miss Torsten Ehrenmark and Lars Ulvenstam

I miss Torsten Ehrenmark and Lars Ulvenstam. The longing is unbearable. The foreign correspondent and columnist Torsten Ehrenmark (1919-1989) did ”Summer” for more than 20 years, 1963-84. Lars Ulvenstam, born 1921, hosted “Summer” 1978-2005 and was the one who traditionally always ended the season. Nothing was allowed to get in the way of listening to ”Ulven”. His ”Summer” were holy moments.

Thank God for Tom Alandh. He doesn’t bathe in egocentricity, he talks about important stuff without nagging about politics, he offers recognition in the form of music and what he says. And neither he, Torsten Ehrenmark nor Lars Ulvenstam ever dicussed their private lives during prime time.

Drop in quality and left-wing bias in SR:s news programmes

In Sweden Radio’s news programmes – ”P1 Morgon”, ”Ekot”, ”Studio Ett”, and ”God Morgon Världen” – a devastating drop in quality has been underway for many years. ”Why?” wonders Ulrika Knutson in the magazine Journalisten.

”The newspaper industry is in free fall, the money is running dry, the homogenization is increasing, the editorial culture is eroding. But why has public service radio also hopped on the emergency train, without anyone directly forcing them? Some of the quality decline in the daily flow is starting to become a little too noticeable” writes Knutson

Interview techniques suffer from a lack of follow-up questions.

It is also sparser between self-produced news

”More and more programmes refer to extra material, long interviews – and pictures! – on the web, whilst the actual transmissions are sparser, chattier and less pressing.”

That the clear left-wing bias amongst Ekots foreign correspondents Cecila Uddén (Kairo), Lotten Collin (Rio de Janeiro) and the South Europe correspondent Beatrice Janzon (Paris) is allowed to go on year after year is a mystery. Or not, because they obviously have their bosses blessing. Beatrice Janson sounds like she’s telling fairytales and bursts with joy when she interviews African boat migrants on Lampedusa or Sicily who say that they want to come to Sweden. Then Beatrice Janzon feels selected and honoured.

Why is information siphoned via Cecilia Uddén year after year?

The historian Eli Göndör went about reviewing P1 ”Konflikt”, one of SR:s most prominent left-wing fortresses, the results were published on Timbro. He reviewed the program presentations of “Konflikt” between 2008 and 2010 during the Arab Spring years. A grand total of 113. The USA is mentioned 42 times, Sweden 20, and Israel 15. Egypt was mentioned 2 (two) times – Syria not at all

”When Arab countries are mentioned they are rarely or not at all protagonists of their own fate” said Eli Göndör when he presented the study at a Timbro seminar. The Seminar can be seen here.

And why are SR:s listener forced year after year to get information about the Middle East siphoned via one and the same person, namely Cecilia Uddén? asks Eli Göndör.

”Pain in the ass to work at Konflikt”

Nina Benner, head of ”God morgon världen”, ”Konflikt” and ”Ekots Saturday Interview” refused to take the criticism to heart. She vigorously denied that there was a left-wing bias in ”Konflikt”. Then former ”Konflikt” employee Negar Josephi stands up in the audience, takes the microphone and says. (approximately 50 minutes in)

”I would like to firmly claim that ”Konflikt” is a very left-wing program. And that is a big problem. I could not sit there and listen to their opinions about Israel, Jews and the conflict in the Middle East. It was bloody tough for me as a Jewess (…) When everyone who make programs about the situation abroad has the same opinion about the Middle East it’s the same angle year after year after year.”

”It’s as if the establishment is on steroids”

A friend writes an e-mail to me:

”It’s as if the establishment is on steroids right before it all falls apart. It’s like a last feeble attempt to hold on to the good times they have enjoyed. The crack in the facade is Alice Teodorescu and a couple of others.”

On the 8^th of July the biggest news story in both SVT Rapport and Aktullt is a sob story made by Fabian Sturm. It’s about a 16-year-old gypsy beggar Beatrice Vidrascu and her boyfriend, 21-year-old Ysak Pruteanu who have been staying illegally in Sweden for more than the three months allowed by the EU’s freedom of movement. They should have gone home to Rumania long ago.

The sixteen-year-old is pregnant. Neither of them have work, accommodation, or income. They have no insurance cards, because they haven’t worked in their home country. As EU-citizens they don’t have grounds for asylum either. They choose to have a child either way. No critical questions are asked. Not a single question. The reportage is supposed to be ”shocking” and upsetting that Gypsy beggars aren’t allowed to give birth to their children for free in Sweden (and thereby get free accommodation and lifetime support in the form of taxpayer-sponsored welfare)

And only in Sweden’s Television can a professing Stalinist (Sven Wolter) praise Stalin and North Korea during prime time for a full hour without bothersome questions from the interviewer Anna Hedenmo.

You don’t mess with people who have 30 seconds to the microphone

How can it go on like this in public service? Jasenko Selimovic writes from his own experience of working at Sveriges Radio:

”Few think that public service couldn’t get better. Probably not a single politician, regardless of affilliation. Not even those who work there. So why isn’t the subject broached? Why are there so few political proposals? Why does so little change? Because politicians, like the higher ups at public service, aren’t that suicide prone. You don’t mess with people who have 30 seconds to a microphone with one million listeners. Ask Peter Örn.” (CEO of Sweden’s Radio 2004-07 – my note)

”Why don’t things change from within? Because the field of journalism have few advancement opportunities, lots of competition, relatively few opportunities to make money and few alternative routs. You only have your job, your ”inslag”, reportage, dokumentär and that gives you everything: status, position, substitutes for a good salary. You don’t take that from people. Because then you take everything from them.”

”Internally political bias is a non-issue”

Political bias of public service is a non-issue internally. Jasenko Selimovic writes:

”During my five years at SR we occasionally discussed bias in some broadcast, but we never discussed from which political perspective our programs reflected the world. Nor did we talk about the possibility that our political sympathies might affect the program. The survey which showed an overrepresentation of Green Party- and Left Party sympathies was dismissed with the argument: ”Just because journalists vote for MP or V doesn’t mean that their programs will reflect those views.”

”The real problem here isn’t (political) sympathies for certain perspectives but a lack of understanding for others. Hence some questions are rarely asked. Perspective isn’t featured and concretization rarely occurs. If you ask employees at public service to concretize the advantages of equality many concrete, funny program ideas come forth. If you ask them about the cons of equality things will stand still. Because you don’t know about them, and don’t know how that could be concretized as personal stories.” ”Very few would today dare, or even want, to do a real Susanne Björkman-documentary about SD-voters, where you without caricaturing or patronizing make listeners identify, sympathise and feel understanding for SD’s supporters.”

Left-wing journalists think they are mainstream

Left-wing journalists are often unaware of the fact that they are biased. Their own opinions are so obvious to themselves that they think they are mainstream and that nobody could think in a different way. This is because they live in a small protected world where they rarely experience corrective feedback from outside, a sectarian lifestyle of sorts where they solely socialize with people who have the exact same opinions as themselves and cultivate the same (left-wing) ideals.

Every time they experience the reality of others, outside of the own bubble, it becomes a shocking experience. As an illustration I strongly recommend one of the journalistic nadirs at Almedalen, Belinda Olsson’s interview with Jimmie Åkesson right after his party leader speech. Her shock and incomprehension at facing an audience that she herself hadn’t hand picked couldn’t have been greater than if she’d inexplicably landed on Mars.

”The Swedish debate climate is ”terrible”

For decades Kjell Albin Abrahamson worked as an Eastern Europe correspondent. Now he is 70-years-old, retired, and sits at a summer place in the village Truvbacken, Jämtland, and is interviewed by Länstidningens Pelle Zackrisson. He calls the Swedish debate climate ”terrible” and says that it is one of the reasons he doesn’t move home to Sweden on a full-time basis and nowadays lives in Northern Germany.

”The second someone doesn’t have an opinion which doesn’t fall within the Overton Window you get a fascist stamp. It’s a very intolerant climate today in Sweden. I don’t know how we are going to get out of it.”

A long list people in public service need to be purged

Yes, how are we going to get out of it? How is the Overton Window going to be torn down? How is the media going to start producing material that the public can trust again? Journalism built on facts that allow people with diverse opinions come be heard. If an improvement shall be made possible a long list of managers, middle-managers, and journalists at all levels of public service must be purged, taking their inveterate left-wing opinions with them and seek other employment. Besides, the left seems to like purges.

I won’t mention any names, but we all know who they are. They who entered Swedish radio and TV-houses in 1968 and latched onto the walls since. Enough is enough.

The market forces will take care of Aftonbladet.

Originally written in Swedish by Julia Caesar and published on Snaphanen

Translated to English and posted on Swedish Surveyor by yours truly.

Other chronicles by Julia Caesar

-When Journalists Rape

-Congratulations Pussy Porters

-Confiscating Housing for the Greater Good

-“Us” and “Them”

–When will they build the gas chambers?

–Sweden – A Raped Country

Published by Utlandssvensk on Cavatus in 2012

For a very long time, there has been some kind of limit to what the media publishes. It has certainly been very flexible. But it has been there. Let us call it the border of shame. Ahead of the 2010 election it loosened up considerably. Now it has been crossed by a wide margin in a manner that gives me shivers down the spine. The plug has been pulled, all dams have burst. Now the unadulterated hatred flows freely, with the silent consent of all official bodies. The journalists are stoning their own people – and none of them stand up and say STOP – enough is enough!

In Länstidningen, a social democratic newspaper in Östersund, the Sweden Democrats party leader Mr. Jimmie Åkesson is pictured as a cockroach. Behind him stands a pest control worker wearing protective clothing and gas mask while spraying deadly poison gas from a canister marked with the symbols of all the other seven parliamentary parties.

The symbolism could not be clearer. Dissidents are to be exterminated. Sweden Democrats are pests that shall be killed with poison gas. The goal is clear: the party is to be wiped out by any means necessary. The hatred is breaking all boundaries. I cannot recall that I ever have seen a Swedish party leader depicted as vermin to be exterminated. Mr. Olof Palme and Mr. Torbjorn Fälldin and several other Swedish politicians were the subject of a healthy amount of political cartoons at the time. But never, ever with a threat of harsh and sudden death programmed in.

The historical parallels are terrifying
Länstidningen’s low water mark is not satire. It is pure and unadulterated evil that flows from the editorial page. The historical parallels are horrifying. The only archetypes the cartoon can be associated with are the Nazi hate pictures of Jews in the 1930s. Those images paved the way for the gas chambers at Auschwitz, Sobi Bor and Bergen-Belsen and the execution of millions of Jews, mentally retarded and mentally ill. Are we 70 years later to go down that path again? Should hatred against dissenters legitimize extinction? Have we learned nothing seven decades after one of history’s greatest massacres?

“The worst example of misanthropy”
The cartoon is created by Mr. Kjell Nilsson Mäki and illustrates a wishy-washy and intellectually inferior editorial by Ms. Ida Nilsing. After the publication on Saturday, Länstidningen has been stormed by hundreds of angry and outraged comments and emails. In a letter to the newspaper’s editor in chief and responsible publicist, Mr. Lennart Mattsson, a reader writes:

I have not seen a worse example of misanthropy anywhere in Sweden throughout my life. Länstidningen Östersund should not with a single word criticize a party that wants to have political debates since Ida Nilsing and the rest of you at Länstidningen wants to exterminate by gas and physically annihilate the Sweden Democrats – probably because you are not up to “taking the debate.

You would rather murder people than debate with them. Who made the cartoon? What political affiliation does a person have who wants to gas others to death?

Why is it that you cannot produce an editorial that contains something worth reading? Do you lack staff? Are there no reasonably intelligent people employed by the newspaper? Or are you so bloodthirsty that you chose the worst person you could find to write up the bland text?”

Länstidningen: “We are proud”
Länstidningen today responded to the outcry by stating that it is “proud to offer our readers something other than bland portraits of politicians who hold press conferences.”

We are also proud to be one of the few newspapers that keep the tradition of political cartoon satire alive. On Saturday’s editorial page Jimmie Åkesson was drawn as a cockroach that would be exterminated by a pest control worker, sent by the other parliamentary parties. LT’s artist, Kjell Nilsson-Mäki, has explained that he wanted the cartoon to show how the old established parties, despite persistent attempts, have failed to combat the Sweden Democrats. Given this explanation, the illustration is reasonable. But, and herein lies the problem, the illustration and the text have two different aims, which causes the whole to become blurred and open to misunderstanding, especially if one wants to misunderstand.

Survives at taxpayer benevolence
Länstidningen is one of many social democratic newspapers that generates massive losses. The newspaper cannot survive on selling their products that fewer want to buy. LT is surviving due to taxpayers’ benevolence in the form of state press subsidies. This year, the paper received a total of 16,861,000 kronor (approx. 2.5 million USD) in operating subsidies and 361,950 kronor (approx. 55.000 USD) in distribution support. A grand total of 17,222,950 kroner. More than 17 million in state aid to produce death threats against the leader of a democratically elected parliament party.

Länstidningen scandal picture marks a worrying shift in the media’s approach. The plug has been pulled. This signals a brutal escalation of violence and persecution against all who sympathize with the Sweden Democrats’ policies or vote SD since the other seven parties, with their ignorance of vital and crucial issues for the country, do not give them any other choice. Not only should it be open season for death threats against SD’s leader, it is also about time to persecute the 5.7 percent, or 340,000 voters who voted for SD in the 2010 election, says music critic Mr. Po Tidholm in Sunday’s SR (state controlled radio broadcaster) “Good morning world”.

“The big problem is the voters’

His view is that Swedish writers and commentators have “held back” for two years, but are now finally wallowing in expletives and vivid descriptions filled with adjectives regarding SD after Expressen’s (major tabloid that recently exposed a 2 year old video that showed some senior SD MPs behaving badly after a wet night) outstanding work.

“There is suddenly energy and joy in the debate and a general sense of relief” notes Mr. Po Tidholm. Now only one problem remains, and it is major:

The only ones that get off scot-free are the voters. It feels somewhat lame. It is, after all, they who have caused this mess. The presence of a xenophobic party did not became a serious democratic problem until the citizens decided to vote them into the assemblies.

It is “the regular Swedish voters, who – if one is to believe current polls – increasingly feel that SD has the answers to their questions” – who, according to Mr. Po Tidholm, are the problem.

The statistics claim that SD voters are usually low-skilled unemployed men, living in rural areas. This in turn makes them a little hard to pick on, since most media people, of which nearly one hundred percent are white, urban middle-class people, after all, have a some anxiety about their position of power, residence and socioeconomic status. The class gap is simply a little too wide.

“People are fucking stupid”
Mr. Po Tidholm considers himself to have a free pass by his choice of residence. He lives in the countryside in Trönödal in Söderhamn in Hälsingland. There, SD got 11.6 percent of the votes in the 2010 election and was thus “the most SD infected north of Blekinge” in Mr. Tidholm’s words. After much pondering, he has reached the conclusion that the simplest way for him to relate to this political reality is with some professional distance. “But basically, I’m tired and angry and think that people are fucking stupid,” he says.

“Those who farts loudly during dinner”

One conclusion that could be drawn by the success of New Democracy (political party that had a brief stay in parliament 20 years ago) was that there were a considerable number of Swedes who for various reasons want to be those who farts loudly during dinner, ruining the mood with tasteless jokes and use their voting rights to fuck with the so-called establishment. Should these people’s opinions suddenly be respected just because they happen to be represented in Parliament?

And then Mr. Po Tidholm delivers the conclusion that is pressing and must be presented:

So what am I getting at? The hard words should reasonably also be directed at those who have voted for these jerks.

More poison gas against dissidents!
Thanks, that hit the bull’s eye. More contempt for “stupid low-skilled unemployed men living in rural areas”! They are getting off far too easy. Go get the morons! More persecution, more hatred! Bring out the guns against “those who farts loudly during dinner, ruining the mood with tasteless jokes and use their voting rights to fuck with the so-called establishment”! More poison gas against dissident roaches!

The thing that Mr. Po Tidholm and others in the Swedish PC elite fears more than anything else is that the Sweden Democrats’ policies are winning supporters in significantly larger groups than the stupid men in rural areas; academics, intellectuals, writers, journalists, doctors, police officers, nurses, social workers, officials, actors, artists. It’s not quite as easy to openly despise and want to gas to death people belonging to the same social class as yourself as it is to spew contempt on farting low-skilled unemployed men living in rural areas.

What Länstidningen and Mr. Po Tidholm do is not only to descend down to the level of mud wrestling. They also kill the democratic discourse. Without conversation, democracy does not exist. When the words run out and only hatred remains, then we are in very serious trouble.

Now I wonder just one thing: when will the gas chambers be built?

Originally Written in Swedish by Julia Caesar, published on Snaphanen in 2012

Translated by Utlandssvensk and published on Cavatus in 2012

Other chronicles by Julia Caesar:

-“Us” and “Them”

-When Journalists Rape

-Congratulations Pussy Porters

–Confiscating Houses for the Greater Good

-The Swedish Media’s Final Stand

-Sweden – A Raped Country

Published by Utlandssvensk on Cavatus in 2012

Today’s text is a translation (by Utlandssvensk – a Swede in exile) of a column written by a renowned Swedish journalist. This journalist has been writing one column a week on the Danish website Snaphanen since after the Swedish election in September 2010. She has to write under the pseudonym of Julia Caesar (the late actress in the mid 20^th century) in order to not be harassed by Sweden’s “do-gooders”, journalists, politicians and in particular AFA/Antifa

Sweden – A raped country

A beautiful summer is coming to an end. But it was not beautiful for everybody. During this summer, the number of reported rapes has increased by 25% compared to the same period last year.

According to BRA (a government agency supposedly tasked with preventing crimes) a total of 1091 rapes were reported during June and July. Rape of children under the age of 15 has increased with 53%, from 192 cases last year to 294 this year, again only for June and July. In total, sexual crimes increased by 18% compared to the same period last year. BRA believes that the reason for all of this is the beautiful summer weather:

“One explanation for this increase may be partly due to the nice weather this summer,” according to Sven Granath, criminologist and investigator at BRA, to TT

Those are the words of a civil servant that has become totally politically correct. I pray for Sven Granaths soul. He works at a government agency that is fully funded by taxpayers and has made it his mission to hide the truth using any means necessary whilst administering tranquilizers to both the general population and the ruling government. In a dictatorship, BRA would be called “The Board” and would be tasked with making undesirable facts invisible. But what is the difference really? Sweden is approaching the condition that are typical for a dictatorship, i.e. government agencies that hide the truth from citizens and a media that is loyal to the government and considers the promotion of state sponsored lies to be its mission.

The truth has a price

Perhaps Mr. Granath is afraid of losing his job, which would be understandable. Maybe he is pondering the fate that befell Mr. Mauricio Rojas, spokesman for the liberal party regarding immigration, after he published an article in the DN (a major daily newspaper) that highlighted the underlying cultural reasons for the massive overrepresentation of immigrants among criminals.

Mr. Rojas was made persona non grata in politics and was subjected to slander, intimidation and threats and came to require 24 hour bodyguard protection. Originally, he arrived in Sweden 1974 as a political refugee from Chile, but in 2008 he was forced to flee since he had, once again, become an irritation for a totalitarian regime. He moved to Spain and is today the headmaster of the Madrid School of Integration. You can read about his story on the blog Politiskt Inkorrekt

Truth has a price. The practice of killing the messenger when he brings unwanted news is as old as mankind itself. Perhaps it is the recollection of Mr. Rojas fate that has made Mr. Granath sell his soul on the marketplace of lies and hidden truths. Let us hope that the reward he receives amply compensates for the truths that he has sacrificed.

An “impartial” civil servant

Let us also say a small prayer for Mr. Granath’s co-worker, Mrs. Klara Hradilova-Selin, who serves as an“impartial” expert on rape at BRA whilst being a member of the Facebook group “Social Democrats in parliament – No thanks”.

Sorry, that should of course be “Sweden Democrats in parliament – No thanks”. In Sweden, such publicly stated views are not considered to be a problem for somebody that claims to be politically impartial.

Why are persons with foreign backgrounds regarded as impartial when it comes to issues regarding immigration? Increasingly, they are marching as frontline soldiers fighting for multiculturalism on all levels of society. Nobody dares to argue against them, since you would then be labeled as a “xenophobe”. Is there anybody that believes that Mrs. Hradilova-Selin’s immigrant background does not affect her and causes scientific bias when it comes to questions about the statistical overrepresentation of immigrants as perpetrators of crime? Mrs. Hradilova-Selin delivered an excellent example of the fine art of truth bending when she was interviewed on SVT Rapport (state broadcaster news show).

We are informed that female rape victims are simply prejudiced (implicitly racist) when they claim that the perpetrator has dark hair. People that are subjected to serious crimes remember events wrongly and are controlled by preconceived notions. Women that get their lives and genitals thrashed by Ahmed from Iraq or Mustafa from Somalia must be made to realize that their recollection is flawed. In actual fact, it was the light blonde Kalle (typical Swedish name) that committed the heinous crime. Hallelujah! What an enormous comfort for a woman that had been subjected to the worst possible form of degradation. Thank you, BRA! Thank you, Mr.Granath and Mrs. Klara Hradilova-Selin. You are doing your job as useful idiots exactly as expected and you will surely receive a medal for long and faithful service to the public lies.

Immigrants overrepresented by 450 percent

What Mrs. Hradilova-Selin is saying is remarkable, since it contradicts BRA’s own research. Two major reports, “Crime among first and second generation immigrants, 1996:2” and “Crime among persons born in Sweden and abroad, 2005:17”, show that immigrants are heavily overrepresented among criminals. These are facts. In general, they are overrepresented by a bit more that 100 percent. But when it comes to more serious crimes, such as murder, manslaughter and assault on strangers, immigrants are overrepresented by 400 – 500 percent. For rape the number is 450 percent.

The person responsible for the two BRA reports, Director Jan Ahlberg, died in 2005 and the moral courage of BRA died with him. Beyond the grave, Mr. Ahlberg can no longer defend himself and the coast is clear for his unscrupulous colleagues to dance on his grave and pretend that his research does not exist. Mrs. Hradilova-Selin does not need to have any fear for repercussions, since the fact that she is both a woman and an immigrant gives her colleagues double reasons to treat her with silk gloves.

Perpetrators from Muslim countries

Immigrants are, of course, not a uniform group and the vast majority of immigrants are committing no crimes at all, while others do it to a very large extent. The largest overrepresentation in crime is displayed by immigrants from Muslim countries like Algeria, Iraq, Libya, Morocco and Tunisia as well as from Chile. The lowest numbers of crimes are committed by immigrants from Western Europe, Southeast Asia, USA, Canada, Australia and New Zealand.

Since BRA issued its first report in 1996, Sweden has granted permanent residence to more than 700.000 immigrants. In particular, immigration from Muslim countries increased dramatically. With astounding bad judgment and naiveté, both conservative and social democratic governments since the early 70’s have kept the Swedish borders wide open for all sorts of unidentified adventurers, war criminals and other offenders. Since 96 percent lack identification documents, it is in almost all cases people of unknown identity that are allowed into the country and then granted permanent residency.

Somalis – the largest group of immigrants admitted into Sweden, with an increase of 70 percent since last year – and Iraqis are climbing quickly up the rape scoreboard. But we will never know the truth. Apart from the reports 1996 and 2005, BRA suspended reporting the ethnicity of criminals in their statistics 1994. Such facts are not desirable, no matter how true they are.

Sweden has the second highest rate of rape in the world

Serious crime is increasing to an extent that should keep the government and parliament sleepless at night. Crime is increasing beyond all control. Sweden is a raped and violence-torn country located at the top of international comparisons. According to a report by the UN agency UNDC (United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime) recently, Sweden is at number 2 in the UN statistics with 53.2 reported rapes per 100 000 inhabitants. Only Lesotho, a small country in south Africa, has more reported rapes than Sweden. The league table looks like this:

1. Lesotho: 91.6
2. Sweden: 53.2
3. USA: 28.6
4. Zimbabwe: 25.6
5. Norway: 19.8
6. Israel: 17.6

Despite the high Swedish number, there are far more cases that go unreported.

“The problem is that hardly any crime has such a proportion of unreported cases as rape. In Sweden, about 80-90 percent of rapes never become known to society. The reluctance to report is partly due to the fact that rape is a crime that is surrounded by shame,” according to Professor Niklas Långström, sex crime researcher at the Karolinska Institute.

Feelings of shame in the victim, that is. That the perpetrators feel shame is likely to be more rare. The Aftonbladet (major daily tabloid) reports the news like this. We can note that the Aftonbladet are demonstrating a highly creative renewal of the art of making headlines “Sweden at the bottom of rape statistics.” At the bottom?? When the article is about the fact that Sweden tops the list with the second highest rape numbers in the world.

Last year, an EU report showed that Sweden has the highest number of reported rapes in the EU. 5937 rapes were reported to the police in 2009. That is up 9 percent from 2008. But statistics on serious crimes should be viewed over the longer term. Since the new millennium, reported rapes have increased by 193 percent. 1975 was the year in which a unanimous Parliament decided that Sweden should be transformed into a multicultural society. One result is an increase in reported rapes since 1975 with an incredible 1395%. (Graphic: Affe)

Nothing wrong with raping a Swedish girl

Socioeconomic factors are a popular explanation for immigrants being overrepresented in crime. That is, if you are unemployed, poor and live in an ugly concrete tower in the suburbs, it is entirely in order to rape, mug, assault and murder. But already in the BRA report from 1996 it was said:

“Immigrants’ overrepresentation in crime is not explained by an unfavorable distribution of gender, age and location. Added to this is the fact that immigrant overrepresentation in crime cannot be explained by the fact that immigrants are less fortunate than Swedes in terms of socioeconomic status.”

The approach of many Muslim men is that there is nothing wrong in raping Swedish girls and women. In their culture, the man has every right to dispose of the woman as he sees fit. Some young men that were interviewed by the daily DN in response to a gang rape in Rissne outside of Stockholm put it like this:

“It’s not as wrong to rape a Swedish girl as it is to rape an Arab girl, says Hamid. The Swedish girl gets a lot of help afterwards, and she had probably been fucked already. But the Arab girl will get problems with her family. For her it is a great shame to be raped. It is important that she retains her virginity when she marries. ”

“It’s far too easy to get a whore … girl, I mean,” says Hamid, and displays an embarrassed smile due to his choice of words. Many immigrant boys go with Swedish girls when they are teenagers. But then when they are to marry, they take a proper woman from their own culture that has not been with any guy. So will I do. I do not have much respect for Swedish girls. You could say that they get fucked until they are broken. “(DN 11 February 2000).

Rape is a hate crime

Rape and gang rapes are hate crimes committed by men. They are a demonstration of male power and hatred. When immigrants commit rape, it is in most cases a racist hate crime specifically aimed at Swedish girls and women. The rapes expose deep divisions within the immigrant male psyche. Muslim men with a prehistoric view of women and sexuality living in Western societies suffer a culture shock that apparently can cause a total short-circuit in the brain. Nordic women are independent and have the same value as men. We dress and do as we like. The power, status and superiority that men enjoy in most of the migrants’ home countries, cannot be collected here. Rape is an expression of frustration and aggression that this arouses in some Muslim men. The women in the new home country are not under his control. Therefore, we are regarded as “whores”, which according to these men’s way of looking at things legitimizes their abuse of us.

But it’s not just the Swedish girls and women who are raped. Immigrant girls are also vulnerable, and for them a rape could mean death. In a culture of honor, it is the woman’s fault if she is raped. She is considered to have attracted the offender, and all the guilt and shame are put upon her. She risks death penalty because she has destroyed the family’s so-called “honor”. If a woman would not be a virgin when she marries, it will be disastrous for her and her entire family and relatives. The man has the right to displace her and dissolve the marriage. The whole family’s honor is ruined, and the marriage value of her sisters and female cousins falls drastically. Honor can only be restored by her death.

Cell phone blackmail

The death threat against a woman is present even if she has been raped. In the study that was done last year by the City of Stockholm (Mrs. Kickis Åhré-Älgamo and Mrs.Ulla-Britt Fingal: “Honor related oppression and violence in the City of Stockholm. Report 2009″, University of Stockholm, Department of Social Work) 14 girls over the age of 17 years stated that they had been raped. Only two had filed a police report – twelve had not dared because of the requirement that they should be virgins, which applies in all circumstances. In this group there are also cases of rectal rape as an adaptation to the culture of honor demands that woman should be a virgin.

This placing of guilt has the effect that the crimes are not reported to the police and the perpetrators go free. The perpetrators – in most cases from the same country as the girls – can film the rape with a camera phone and use the images in order to blackmail by threatening to put them on the Internet or show them to the girl’s family. If a woman reveals what she has suffered, she will have signed her own death sentence

Goodbye to safety for women

What is happening to girls and women in Sweden today is that we are gradually forced to restrict our freedom of movement for fear of being raped or subjected to other violence. Safety for women no longer exists.

• You do not go out alone at night.
• You do not take your bike through a dark area.
• You do not take a bus or train home on a Saturday night. You take a taxi.
• You do not take the shortcut through the forest.

This is the dictatorship of fear and lack of freedom. What is happening in today’s Sweden is an extreme anti feminine policy of absolutely intolerable violence and oppression, specifically directed against half of the citizens. The freedom and rights that it has taken Swedish women a century to achieve have been sold out by parliament and the government. If we start from BRA’s estimate that only 5-10 percent of committed rapes are reported to the police, there are 30.000-60.000 girls and women who are raped each year. Swedish politicians thus annually offer 30.000-60.000 women as sacrificial lamb on the bloody altar of multiculturalism. They obviously think that multiculturalism is worth it. What the victims think, nobody cares to ask.

The dirty crimes – A story from a police officer

It’s not just in the rape statistics that Sweden shows horrific numbers. Assault offenses have increased by 45 percent since the turn of the millennium. The total number of reported violent crimes has in the same period increased by 47 percent. If we begin in 1975, the starting year for multiculturalism, the total number of reported violent crimes has increased by a staggering 312 percent.

A rapidly growing category is mugging. In 2009, 6730 robberies were committed against individuals. The increase from 1975 is 234 percent, but is probably much higher, since muggings are sometimes classified in other ways. Behind the neutral word “mugging” hides a terrible reality that leaves the victims with severe traumas. A very largely proportion of the victims are defenseless children, adolescents or elderly persons. A police officer who writes anonymously on the former Swedish blog Politically Incorrect (today replaced by avpixlat.info) talks about what he calls “the dirty crimes”:

“Several times a week I go home to our elderly and weak that have fallen victim of dirty crime (where someone intrudes into the apartment and deceive/abuse the old person until they get all the valuables) and ask for a descriptions of the perpetrator that committed this terrible abuse. Each time the offender is described as an immigrant from a particular ethnic group. Not once during my entire police career have I had the offenders being described as Swedes. The same applies to the thousands of muggings in which our children and weak are threatened and robbed on the streets. 95 percent of the hundreds of offenders that have been described to me have been identified by the victim as an immigrant. These crimes are characterized by a complete lack of respect for human life. I sit in front of an old person with fear in his eyes after having been attacked in his own home – the only safe place that they had left. Full of bruises and testifying about the knife threats they have just endured, and the humiliation they felt when they could not protect themselves.”

A crime wave against the elderly

A wave of crime against the elderly is sweeping through Sweden. Often they happen in a similar way. Two or three women of foreign origin follow the old ones from the bank or store. They follow through the gate and sees where the old person goes in. A moment later they ring the doorbell and ask for a glass of water, help to write a note to someone in the house or some other made-up task. While one of the women occupy the old person, the other walks around the apartment, picking up their cash and valuables. In western Sweden, 15 robberies of elderly persons occurred just last week.

“Most indications point to that the crimes are committed by the same constellation of criminals,” said Detective Inspector Ulf Lokrantz, who works with this type of crime in West Götaland. In plain language, Roma (also known as Gypsies), but a police officer cannot say this if he wants to keep his job.

We are at war with the Swedes

The same crudity applies to robberies directed against adolescents. Ms. Petra Åkesson has in her thesis in sociology interviewed boys between 15 and 17 years convicted of mugging. She wanted to explore the reality behind the wave of muggings that has affected Malmö. The young robbers did not show any remorse or understanding that they had done something wrong. On the contrary – they bragged about who had robbed the most.

“When we’re out robbing, we wage war, we are at war with the Swedes” was a recurring argument. The boys from one school told me smiling that “there comes a great feeling through my body when we rob, you feel satisfied and happy, it feels like one has succeeded.”

To rob Swedish children and adolescents is a deliberate choice. It’s about exercising power: “For me it is power that the Swedes should lie down on the ground and kiss my feet.” “It’s so easy to mug Swedes,” says one of the boys. “When we see some Swedes that seem rich or have good phones, we mug them. The Swedes do not do anything, they just give us the stuff, they’re such wimps.”

Increasing insecurity

Who is surprised that insecurity is increasing? It is one of the multicultural society’s logical consequences. According to the 2009 Citizen poll among 4200 residents in the City of Stockholm, 72 percent of the residents of Rinkeby-Kista is so insecure in their neighborhood that they refrain from going out after darkness. In Spånga-Tensta the corresponding number is 66 percent, in Hässelby-Vällingby 63 percent, in Farsta 59 percent. In Skärholmen 71 percent do not dare go out after darkness. The fear of assault and other violent crimes is high. The most insecurity and worry is found in the immigrant-dense areas.

Let us give thanks to our politicians in all seven political parties for the fact that we live in an increasingly violent and insecure reality, since there is such an overwhelming consensus on the conduct of immigration policy that they refuse to even discuss it. Each one of us who lives in Sweden should realistically count on being robbed, beaten or subjected to other violence. In particular, a woman should not expect to be able to move freely outside, if she does not want to risk being raped. Especially if the weather is nice.

Did the politicians ever ponder the consequences before they pushed through multiculturalism and mass immigration? Did they ever think about an expected mass importation of crime? I allow myself to doubt, on two grounds: authentic observations of politician’s brain power in general, and the observation that they have moved themselves to safety in their white ethnic enclaves.

Not a single politician wants to halt the progression

Neither of the two political blocs seems to regard the rapes and other violent crimes against Swedes as a problem. In any case, there are no hints of any attempt at political actions to stop the growing and increasingly brutal violence. Hitherto NOT ONE politician in the seven parliamentary parties has stood up and said: “This development is unacceptable. We must by all means try to stop it.” Not one! They regard it as below their dignity to even discuss the issue. This is since they know that if they deal with crime, they must also deal with the irresponsible immigration policies. And that is a sacred cow that must not be slaughtered. Security for the population is apparently nothing that concerns them. The rape epidemic and the other crime are a non-issue and certainly not a topic for the election. But is there any question that is more important than people’s safety and security?

“When I met Justice Minister Beatrice Ask for an interview in March, I asked her if she was concerned about the overrepresentation of immigrants in BRA’s statistics. She replied that she is not. The problem is the crime itself, not the perpetrators descent.” (Ms. Paulina Neuding, in the Swedish newspaper the Svenska Dagbladet, April 11, 2010)

The same Ms. Neuding writes in the liberal magazine Neo:

“Research shows that sexual and gender inequality is related. And with large immigration from countries where women have a very weak position you should probably count on the effect on sex crimes statistics.” (Magazine Neo No. 2 of 2010.)

Politicians who treat their people as garbage and are not even able to provide protection to the weak and vulnerable – women, children and old people – what confidence do they deserve?

The election results will show.

Written by Julia Caesar, 15 August, 2010

Translated by Utlandssvensk and published on Cavatus in 2012

Other chronicles by Julia Caesar:

-“Us” and “Them”

-When Journalists Rape

-Congratulations Pussy Porters

–Confiscating Houses for the Greater Good

-The Swedish Media’s Last Stand

-When will they build the gas chambers?

Picture: The fall of the Berlin Wall on the 9th of November 1989. For 28 years it had divided Germany in two. The East German government called it the “Anti-Fascist Rampart“

The political landscape in Sweden is changing from the ground up. It isn’t happening over a few hours time, like when the Berlin Wall fell on the 9th of November in 1989. But it’s happening. And what we are seeing now is only the beginning. How will the corrupt media adapt to the change? The question is if and when they will realize that the battle is lost and that an epoch of lies, whitewashing and agenda journalism has come to an end.

The change will be painful for journalists

Whether journalists like it or not the political shift in conjunction with the swift & subsequent decay of important areas of society (schools, elderly care, healthcare, criminality, unemployment, housing shortage) will gradually force journalism to mirror reality instead of the opinions of individual journalists or the political agenda of editors. It simply isn’t possible to lie about the blessings of multiculturalism or mass immigration forever when citizens clearly see with their own eyes how their country is being dismantled in front of them. The change will be painful for journalists. The media’s final stand is proportional to the losses journalists make when their lies are unveiled. It won’t be pretty.

Sweden Democrats break new record – 18,7% in Demoskop

In the latest Demoskop/Expressen poll, support for the Moderates had reduced by 3% to 23,1%. The Sweden Democrats increased by the same amount and broke a new record with 18,7%. Only 4,4% now separates the Sweden Democrats from the Moderates. All of the remaining parties have either increased or decreased within the margin of error

”It’s a dramatic development of the public opinion. SD’s continued rise has without comparison been the biggest element of change in Swedish politics. In just a month the party has halved the gap between the two parties.” – says Peter Santesson, Head of Public Opinion Analysis at Demoskop.

Not even K-G Bergström dares be certain

”This survey will probably send shockwaves through our biggest political parties.” writes Karl-Gösta Bergström, who up until now has never missed an opportunity to write something negative about the Sweden Democrats. Now he doesn’t dare be certain about anything.

Demoskop’s survey was mostly done during the Almedalen Week (week 27). K-G Bergström writes in Expressen:

”Neither Stefan Löfven nor Anna Kinberg Batra seem to have accomplished anything there which has made voters who went over to SD regret their decision.”

”In the eyes of many, Jimmie Åkesson was arrogant in Visby when he unhesitatingly proclaimed that the Sweden Democrats will become Sweden biggest party. To that end seven percentage remain. It’s a lot, but legitimately less than ever than ever.”

”The safety margin to SD is insecure to say the least”

”Even now the safe bet is that SD won’t catch up to S, but I can no longer be certain when saying that. The distance to M is only 4,4 percentage points. Seeing as Kinberg Batra hasn’t been a success, so far in any case, and it is there where the biggest discontent towards the December Agreement exists, it seems that the safety-margin to SD is, to say the very least, unsafe.”

I note that K-G Bergström describes the safety margin between the two parties as ”unsafe”. SD’s successes thereby threaten the Moderates illusion of safety that rests on the December Agreement. The Moderates treating the Sweden Democrats as pariah is coming under heavy fire from their own voters.

Corrected SD result in Demoskop: 21,8%

When it comes to measuring the support SD has amongst the public Demoskop is one of the least accurate opinion institutes. In the 2014 election Demoskop predicted that SD would get 11,2%. The election result was 12,7%. The Norwegian opinion institute Sentio were the only one to make the correct prediction.

If you correct Demoskop’s current SD poll using previous deviations they now have 21,8%. That corresponds better with the party’s June result from Sentio (22,1%), YouGov (20,1%) and Novus (18%). Demoskop showed 15,7% for SD in June.

”The government is paralyzed by haphephobia”

(Haphephobia (n) = fear of touching or being touched)

”With regards to the refugee question the red-green government is paralyzed by haphephobia. Prime Minister Stefan Löfven has simply abdicated from responsibility. The Social-Democratic party congress this year symptomatically decided to not even bring up the migration question. The Green Party lives in a parallel universe where economic resources are infinite” – writes Jenny Sonesson in a leader for Dagens Industri.

The Alliance parties have tied their hands behind their back with the December Agreement and now pretend to be in opposition with unparalleled acting. The opinion polls show that voters are calling their bluff.

Public opinion is no longer possible to ignore

Prior to the 2010 election the goal for large parts of the journalist corps was to use any means necessary to prevent SD from entering the Riksdag.

Two years later, in 2012, and the methods hadn’t improved much. In one particularly distasteful case Jimmie Åkesson, party leader of the Sweden Democrats, was depicted as a cockroach in need of gassing.

But the latest opinion poll should get the journalists who for years have systematically covered up facts and have acted as propagandists for multiculturalism, mass immigration and radical feminism to tremble in their boots. Many years of desperate attempts from journalists and others to stop SD have failed. It is simply not possible to ignore 1/5th of the electorate.

”We know it’s true, but we don’t publicize it”

How will the media handle it? It’s going to be a painful process. Björn Hägers book ”The problematic party” (written prior to the 2010 election) reveals the strained relationship between journalists and SD. In the chronicle ”The Journalist Party and Democracy” I quoted some journalists who were interviewed in the book.

Pontus Mattsson, then political reporter at Sweden Radio’s Eko editorial office, now at Sweden’s Television:

”I think that many would think it a relief if they had a bad election result and ended up under 2 percent, then we wouldn’t have to deal with them.”

Jan A Johansson, chief editor at Skånska Dagbladet

”They (SD) have a number of claims regarding immigration groups, criminality, in Malmö especially, where they go out with claims that we know are true. We can control them, we know about them, but we don’t publish them anyway because we know that it causes social development a shitload of harm.”

Börn Häger:

”Journalists are biased in favour of the current norms and values – and a party that deviates will therefore get the media against them.”

”SD is the obvious alternative for conservatives”

”As early as 2001 the first article on how to stop the Sweden Democrats was published and printed in DN Debatt. 15 years later and the list of more or less worthy attempts to halt the party’s growth is long. ”Don’t talk to them!” ”Talk about them but not with them!” ”Insult them!” The list of successful countermeasures is nonetheless empty. Nothing seems to have helped.” writes the political scientist Andreas Johansson Heinö in Borås Tidning.

”SD have rewritten the political map in Sweden on their own. As a result of this the traditional bourgeois debate regarding liberalism vs. conservatives is becoming obsolete. SD is already the obvious conservative option in Swedish politics.”

Aftonbladet and public service are the last bastions

After the incestuous debauchery at the Almedalen Week between political rulers and the those (journalists) who are appointed to scrutinize them, a couple of weeks of vacation remain. But in August reality will rear it’s ugly head at the editorial offices.

It will be a tough struggle for Aftonbladet and Public Service in particular, the most prominent fortresses of entrenched medial liars. A veritable Berlin Wall of one-eyed left-wing fanaticism. Writers like Aftonbladets Anders Lindberg, Karin Pettersson, Lena Mellin, Daniel Swedin, Jan Guillou, Somar Al Naher, Åsa Linderborg, Fredrik Virtanen, and Oisin Cantwell are beyond saving. The more one has invested in an ideologically controlled and inaccurate worldview, the greater the fall once it all comes crashing down.

More than 80% of state media employees vote Red-Green

Journalists residing in the left-wing fortresses have crafted a unique world view which has little to do with reality. In the world outside of the editorial offices it could be seen as verging on deranged. Which is why most people don’t recognize the world as described by Aftonbladet or Dagens Arena. Or SR:s (Sweden’s Radio) and SVT:s (Sweden’s Television) propaganda which is broadcast across the country from morning to evening.

Professor Kent Asp has in his investigations shown that at Sweden’s Television and Sweden’s Radio a majority sympathize with the Green Party. 52% and 54% respectively and over 80% of journalists working with the Public Service Media sympathize with the Red-Green parties (Left Party, Social-Democrats, and Green Party).

In the election said coalition received a mere 43% of the votes which says a lot about the ideological gap between the journalists working for the public service media and the Swedish people.

”Neutrality is regarded as complicity”

Jasenko Selimovic, formerly the Minister of Integration’s Secretary of State (Peoples Party and previous head of a section at Sweden’s Radio, writes in the periodical Axess about how journalism is gradually changing. He takes the left-wing propagandists working at Aftonbladet and Dagens Arena as an example of political activism as opposed to journalism:

”Previously journalism (and art) was about mirroring, showing voters reality from different perspectives, to make them understand people who don’t think like them, creating an open debate. Nowadays journalists act like escorts, helpers and advocates and less like journalists (…) The idea is anchored in conviction that citizens are weak, entrapped in overbearing structures, unable to oppose the power of the elite and media. That’s why they [the people] need help, interpreters, escorts, rather than journalists.”

“The Left at Arena- and Aftonbladet’s culture pages mock the unwillingness to take a stand. Neutrality is regarded as complicity. Because if citizens are weak and the danger of racism is real, everyone must, including journalists, act, they seem to mean. That’s how citizens and democracy is defended. Activism instead of journalism, taking a stance instead of being neutral, impact awareness instead of impact neutrality.”

Menstruation, transsexuality, unrestricted Immigration and masturbation

“Summer on P1” is one of the most popular shows on Swedish Radio. It is broadcast every day. I switch on my radio at random. On the 30th of June the blogger Clara Henry, 21, talks. ”In autumn her book on menstruation is being released”. Wow! It’s time for a menstrual festival with tampon throwing and drinks with blood clots. I turn it off.

On the 3rd of July transsexual Saga Becker, 26, explains how hard it is to come out of the closet and live like a tranny. I couldn’t care less. I turn it off. On the 4th of July the author and multi-millionaire Liza Marklund, 52, pleads for open borders and unrestricted immigration”.

”For example I think people should be able to live wherever they like in principle. Get rid of all the borders. If Sweden was as densely populated as South Korea 180 million people would live here. And that works well for South Korea, so why not?” – she asks.

I’m pretty sure it’s only on Swedish state radio where people can blurt out such idiocy. I turn it off.

On the 6th of July I turn on the radio at around 14.00. The cartoonist Nina Hemmingsson, 43, discusses masturbation and her orgasms. I turn it off.

Summer – a platform for vagina introspection and multiculturalism

I long for the time when ”Summer” was a program you could listen to. Prior to 1997 when Bibi Rödöö turned it into a platform for vagina introspection and orgasm exhibitionism.

I am dead tired of narcissistic artists, conversations lacking substance and the most perverted hate imaginable being spewed by flipped out screw ups on the extreme-left (Athena Farrkohzad, 21, July 2014) But this is State Radio in its prime. Listeners are to be spoon fed immigration and radical feminism till they puke or choke.

I miss Torsten Ehrenmark and Lars Ulvenstam

I miss Torsten Ehrenmark and Lars Ulvenstam. The longing is unbearable. The foreign correspondent and columnist Torsten Ehrenmark (1919-1989) did ”Summer” for more than 20 years, 1963-84. Lars Ulvenstam, born 1921, hosted “Summer” 1978-2005 and was the one who traditionally always ended the season. Nothing was allowed to get in the way of listening to ”Ulven”. His ”Summer” were holy moments.

Thank God for Tom Alandh. He doesn’t bathe in egocentricity, he talks about important stuff without nagging about politics, he offers recognition in the form of music and what he says. And neither he, Torsten Ehrenmark nor Lars Ulvenstam ever dicussed their genitals during prime time.

Drop in quality and left-wing bias in SR:s news programmes

In Sweden Radio’s news programmes – ”P1 Morgon”, ”Ekot”, ”Studio Ett”, and ”God Morgon Världen” – a devastating drop in quality has been underway for many years. ”Why?” wonders Ulrika Knutson in the magazine Journalisten.

”The newspaper industry is in free fall, the money is running dry, the homogenization is increasing, the editorial culture is eroding. But why has public service radio also hopped on the emergency train, without anyone directly forcing them? Some of the quality decline in the daily flow is starting to become a little too noticeable” writes Knutson

Interview techniques suffer from a lack of follow-up questions.

It is also sparser between self-produced news

”More and more programmes refer to extra material, long interviews – and pictures! – on the web, whilst the actual transmissions are sparser, chattier and less pressing.”

That the clear left-wing bias amongst Ekots foreign correspondents Cecila Uddén (Kairo), Lotten Collin (Rio de Janeiro) and the South Europe correspondent Beatrice Janzon (Paris) is allowed to go on year after year is a mystery. Or not, because they obviously have their bosses blessing. Beatrice Janson sounds like she’s telling fairytales and bursts with joy when she interviews African boat migrants on Lampedusa or Sicily who say that they want to come to Sweden. Then Beatrice Janzon feels selected and honoured.

Why is information siphoned via Cecilia Uddén year after year?

The historian Eli Göndör went about reviewing P1 ”Konflikt”, one of SR:s most prominent left-wing fortresses, the results were published on Timbro. He reviewed the program presentations of “Konflikt” between 2008 and 2010 during the Arab Spring years. A grand total of 113. The USA is mentioned 42 times, Sweden 20, and Israel 15. Egypt was mentioned 2 (two) times – Syria not at all

”When Arab countries are mentioned they are rarely or not at all protagonists of their own fate” said Eli Göndör when he presented the study at a Timbro seminar. The Seminar can be seen here.

And why are SR:s listener forced year after year to get information about the Middle East siphoned via one and the same person, namely Cecilia Uddén? asks Eli Göndör.

”Pain in the ass to work at Konflikt”

Nina Benner, head of ”God morgon världen”, ”Konflikt” and ”Ekots Saturday Interview” refused to take the criticism to heart. She vigorously denied that there was a left-wing bias in ”Konflikt”. Then former ”Konflikt” employee Negar Josephi stands up in the audience, takes the microphone and says. (approximately 50 minutes in)

”I would like to firmly claim that ”Konflikt” is a very left-wing program. And that is a big problem. I could not sit there and listen to their opinions about Israel, Jews and the conflict in the Middle East. It was bloody tough for me as a Jewess (…) When everyone who make programs about the situation abroad has the same opinion about the Middle East it’s the same angle year after year after year.”

”It’s as if the establishment is on steroids”

A friend writes an e-mail to me:

”It’s as if the establishment is on steroids right before it all falls apart. It’s like a last feeble attempt to hold on to the good times they have enjoyed. The crack in the facade is Alice Teodorescu and a couple of others.”

On the 8^th of July the biggest news story in both SVT Rapport and Aktullt is a sob story made by Fabian Sturm. It’s about a 16-year-old gypsy beggar Beatrice Vidrascu and her boyfriend, 21-year-old Ysak Pruteanu who have been staying illegally in Sweden for more than the three months allowed by the EU’s freedom of movement. They should have gone home to Rumania long ago.

The sixteen-year-old is pregnant. Neither of them have work, accommodation, or income. They have no insurance cards, because they haven’t worked in their home country. As EU-citizens they don’t have grounds for asylum either. They choose to have a child either way. No critical questions are asked. Not a single question. The reportage is supposed to be ”shocking” and upsetting that Gypsy beggars aren’t allowed to give birth to their children for free in Sweden (and thereby get free accommodation and lifetime support in the form of taxpayer-sponsored welfare)

And only in Sweden’s Television can a professing Stalinist (Sven Wolter) praise Stalin and North Korea during prime time for a full hour without bothersome questions from the interviewer Anna Hedenmo.

You don’t mess with people who have 30 seconds to the microphone

How can it go on like this in public service? Jasenko Selimovic writes from his own experience of working at Sveriges Radio:

”Few think that public service couldn’t get better. Probably not a single politician, regardless of affilliation. Not even those who work there. So why isn’t the subject broached? Why are there so few political proposals? Why does so little change? Because politicians, like the higher ups at public service, aren’t that suicide prone. You don’t mess with people who have 30 seconds to a microphone with one million listeners. Ask Peter Örn.” (CEO of Sweden’s Radio 2004-07 – my note)

”Why don’t things change from within? Because the field of journalism have few advancement opportunities, lots of competition, relatively few opportunities to make money and few alternative routs. You only have your job, your ”inslag”, reportage, dokumentär and that gives you everything: status, position, substitutes for a good salary. You don’t take that from people. Because then you take everything from them.”

”Internally political bias is a non-issue”

Political bias of public service is a non-issue internally. Jasenko Selimovic writes:

”During my five years at SR we occasionally discussed bias in some broadcast, but we never discussed from which political perspective our programs reflected the world. Nor did we talk about the possibility that our political sympathies might affect the program. The survey which showed an overrepresentation of Green Party- and Left Party sympathies was dismissed with the argument: ”Just because journalists vote for MP or V doesn’t mean that their programs will reflect those views.”

”The real problem here isn’t (political) sympathies for certain perspectives but a lack of understanding for others. Hence some questions are rarely asked. Perspective isn’t featured and concretization rarely occurs. If you ask employees at public service to concretize the advantages of equality many concrete, funny program ideas come forth. If you ask them about the cons of equality things will stand still. Because you don’t know about them, and don’t know how that could be concretized as personal stories.” ”Very few would today dare, or even want, to do a real Susanne Björkman-documentary about SD-voters, where you without caricaturing or patronizing make listeners identify, sympathise and feel understanding for SD’s supporters.”

Left-wing journalists think they are mainstream

Left-wing journalists are often unaware of the fact that they are biased. Their own opinions are so obvious to themselves that they think they are mainstream and that nobody could think in a different way. This is because they live in a small protected world where they rarely experience corrective feedback from outside, a sectarian lifestyle of sorts where they solely socialize with people who have the exact same opinions as themselves and cultivate the same (left-wing) ideals.

Every time they experience the reality of others, outside of the own bubble, it becomes a shocking experience. As an illustration I strongly recommend one of the journalistic nadirs at Almedalen, Belinda Olsson’s interview with Jimmie Åkesson right after his party leader speech. Her shock and incomprehension at facing an audience that she herself hadn’t hand picked couldn’t have been greater than if she’d inexplicably landed on Mars.

”The Swedish debate climate is ”terrible”

For decades Kjell Albin Abrahamson worked as an Eastern Europe correspondent. Now he is 70-years-old, retired, and sits at a summer place in the village Truvbacken, Jämtland, and is interviewed by Länstidningens Pelle Zackrisson. He calls the Swedish debate climate ”terrible” and says that it is one of the reasons he doesn’t move home to Sweden on a full-time basis and nowadays lives in Northern Germany.

”The second someone doesn’t have an opinion which doesn’t fall within the Overton Window you get a fascist stamp. It’s a very intolerant climate today in Sweden. I don’t know how we are going to get out of it.”

A long list people in public service need to be purged

Yes, how are we going to get out of it? How is the Overton Window going to be torn down? How is the media going to start producing material that the public can trust again? Journalism built on facts that allow people with diverse opinions come be heard. If an improvement shall be made possible a long list of managers, middle-managers, and journalists at all levels of public service must be purged, taking their inveterate left-wing opinions with them and seek other employment. Besides, the left seems to like purges.

I won’t mention any names, but we all know who they are. They who entered Swedish radio and TV-houses in 1968 and latched onto the walls since. Enough is enough.

The market forces will take care of Aftonbladet.

Originally written in Swedish by Julia Caesar

Translated to English and posted on Swedish Surveyor by yours truly.

Other chronicles by Julia Caesar

-When Journalists Rape

-Congratulations Pussy Porters

-Confiscating Housing for the Greater Good

-“Us” and “Them”

-When will they build the gas chambers?

-Sweden – A Raped Country

24-year-old asylum immigrant Ishaq Ahmed, pictured above in a photo from PST, was recently sentenced to eight years jail in Norway for his participation in terror attacks according to the Norwegian press.

Ahmed was prosecuted for having joined the Islamic State (IS) and Jabhat al-Nusra. Ahmed denies the allegations and claims that he travelled to Syria to work with as a humanitarian aid worker.

Pictures of him, masked and armed to the teeth, tell another tale.

The Norwegian Security Service arrested him when he returned from Syria with a gunshot wound. During his time in Norway he has never worked a day in his life, instead he has been living on dole.

In Sweden Ahmed would probably have been provided with housing, free health care (physical and mental), full financial support, and then finally an earmarked job. All this fast-tracked past the line of law-abiding immigrants and indigenous Swedes.

Related:

More ISIS fighters from one Swedish town than the entire USA

ISIS – sponsored by the Welfare State

Behead an infidel, get a job

A pre-school in Gothenburg forced 120 children between the ages of 1-6 to join a PRIDE march according to Expressen.

The personnel at Hagahuset pre-school defend their actions by explaining that they did it for love and ”everyone’s equal value”. The children who marched and waved rainbow flags shouted chants like ”Who are you allowed to love! – Anyone you want!”

”Do you work a lot with this?”

-Every day we talk about peoples equal value, and that it doesn’t matter what sexual orientation or skin colour you have. We want to promote that everyone is allowed to be different and encourage and support the children. This goes on 365 days a year.

”Do the youngest children understand the meaning of this?”

-Everyone understands, they understand that people have a right to choose. It is seldom that our chldren point out that you and I are different. When you ask the question why the answer comes naturally: ”because you should”.

Children in pre-school are very impressionable and I’m not sure that forcing them to join a parade featuring exhibitionistic half-naked men & women is appropriate.

Whilst sexual minorities ought to be treated equally under the law, homosexuality is not necessarily genetic which in turn means that there is no reason to normalize and promote the practice itself.

If you insist on doing so anyway, please leave the children out of it.

Related:

Asylum homes in Sweden LBTQ-certified

Indoctrination of schoolchildren

Claims criticism that she advocated ISIS propaganda represents “Islamophobia”

Sweden’s reputation as a place where extreme liberalism has run rampant was cemented further after it was revealed that a top official responsible for the country’s immigration policy is a jihadist sympathizer.

Source – INFOWARS – 778 more words

A group of Christian asylum seekers in Sweden were subjected to bullying tactics by Muslim neighbours for wearing the symbol of the cross.

Source – Breitbart – 195 more words

Source: FT

According to the latest Sentio poll the Sweden Democrats are the 2nd biggest political party in Sweden with 23,3%.

Seeing as SD entered parliament in 2010 with a mere 5.7% this poll sends a clear signal to the government and the so-called “opposition.

Whether or not the silent majority waking up and making their voice heard will change any of the destructive policies remains to be seen.

In other news, the Christian Democrats (KD) continue to linger below the 4% threshold required to enter the Riksdag.

Considering that they, along with the other Alliance parties (C, FP, M), have spent the past decade implementing population replacement immigration policies it comes as no surprise that betrayed voters are abandoning ship.

Related: The Swedish Media’s Final Stand

“No, this is not satire.  On July 29, a gay pride parade is scheduled in Sweden.  But, you see, this is no ordinary gay pride parade.  This gay pride parade was created by Jan Sjunnesson, former editor-in-chief for the Samtiden newspaper in Sweden, which is owned by the nationalist Sweden Democrats party (for our Canadian readers, think of the Sweden Democrats as being kind of like the Conservatives which means that they’re considered “extreme far-right” in Sweden). The parade is scheduled to go through Tensta and Husby – two areas where Muslim immigrants are more than 75% of the population.”

Source – BLAZING CAT FUR – 461 more words

“Swedish police have arrested two Afghan men after they locked a local woman in an apartment for seven days over March this year.

[…] The town of Malmo itself is now one of Europe’s most violent cities – dubbed ‘Sweden’s Chicago’, the town has a reputation for religious and ethnic violence and is now caught in a “spiral of retaliation”. In the early hours of this morning the city suffered yet another hand-grenade attack, the second in 12 hours and the third this week…”

Source – BREITBART – 277 more words

Mid Sweden University has to pay 25,000 crowns (roughly $2,900 USD) in damages to one of its male employees. The man, a lecturer at the university, was discriminated against because of his gender when he couldn’t apply for grants which were given exclusively to female scientists.

Source – ROK – 879 more words

“The left is dead set on leading Sweden to its grave, and it would be pretty racist to not let immigrants in on the experience. In fact, they hold the key to realizing this project, since native Swedes can’t even be trusted with the simple task of destroying their own country.”

Read the rest on ROK – 1400 more words

Pride Järva – Source: Avpixlat

According to Fria Tider (Free Times) a left-wing activist who went to protest against the Pride parade which passed through the Muslim suburb known as Husby and Rinkeby was assaulted on his way home.

The event was organized by Jan Sjunnesson, former editor of the Sweden Democrat online-magazine Samtiden, and seeing as he adheres to the “wrong” ideology different leftists and gay rights groups decried the parade as racist!

Aound 20 people showed up yesterday and marched between Rinkeby and Husby outside of Stockholm. Meanwhile more than 100 counter-demonstrators from different left-wing and gay-rights groups (such as the one presumably beat up by locals on his way home) protested against the parade.

“The assault happened at 15:28, so it is not in connection with it, but it is one and a half hours afterwards. There was a brawl in Husby centrum and thats where an assault and hate speech was reported” said Eva Nilsson with the Stockholm police.

On the police’s website they explain how the two perpetrators (appearance left out – my note) disappeared from the scene towards Akalla (an immigrant dominated suburb – my note) and that they were reported of hate-speech because they in connection with the assault said: “derogatory statements about a specific group of people”.

In the clip below you can see the parade in action, hear “Allahu Akbhar” being shouted twice, and some edgy schoolchildren saying that they “hatar bögar” (hate faggots).

As inter-ethnic street battles in the city of Malmö increase, officials at Sweden’s police academies are expressing distress that almost the entire intake of officer cadets are now native Swedes.

Read the rest on BREITBART – 374 more words

Child refugees: Saad Alsaud (left), Sweden’s fastest “14-year-old” and Ahmed Farid (right), “16-years-old”

-The number of children seeking asylum in Sweden has exploded over the last ten years, presumably because children are granted asylum much quicker than adults, and Swedish authorities don’t verify the age of these “children.” Refugees are allowed to bring their entire family to Sweden once they get residency status.

-Swedish journalists do everything in their power to maintain this image of “refugee children.”

-“I’m risking my job by telling you this. … Many of us are under state orders to keep quiet. It’s professional misconduct to contact, for example, immigration services with information about someone lying on their asylum application.” — “Isak,” an employee at a facility for unaccompanied children.

-During the last few years, violent incidents at homes where the “children” live have become more and more prevalent.

-Unaccompanied refugee children are the next billion-dollar industry in Sweden. With an average cost of 2000 kronor $233) per child per day, the 7000 refugee “children” who came last year cost 5.1 billion kronor ($595 million).

Read the rest on GATESTONE INSTITUTE – 2323 more words

Sex is big business in Sweden. In Sweden, big business means government funding and political influence. Two organizations stand out in power, influence, and wealth, and are responsible for corrupting countless children and pushing a bizarre sexual agenda: RFSU and RFSL. This article will give a brief introduction the history and current activities of these two institutions.

Read the rest on ROK – 1241 more words

2015-08-10 – Peaceful, multicultural Sweden has been rocked by yet another grenade attack in Malmö, as well as a double murder in an IKEA store just outside Stockholm.

Read the rest on BREITBART – 261 more words